Motions and Recommendations passed by the
Academic Coordinating Commission 2002-03
(from
Minutes)
Steve Ross, Chair
SUBJECT |
DESCRIPTION |
DATE |
GER Committee |
A motion made by James Inverarity, seconded by Tjalling Ypma, was passed by the ACC to create a �statutory time� for the meeting of the GER committee on Thursdays at 4 pm. Without such a statutory time it proves close to impossible to find a time acceptable to all members. This way, potential members will know whether they will be able to serve.
|
5/27/03 |
Procedure for 5/13/03 ACC Meeting |
A motion,
made by Steve VanderStaay, seconded by Fred Grote, was passed by the members (seven in favor, four opposed) that the
next meeting of the ACC be restricted to procedure.
Members agreed that this would not rule out the possibility of taking
straw polls, or moving to a committee of the whole. |
4/29/03 |
Thanks Expressed to Task Force |
A motion
was made by Tjalling Ypma, seconded by Reiko Darling, to receive the report
of the General Education Task Force and to discharge the Task Force with
thanks, which was passed
unanimously by the Commissioners. |
4/29/03 |
Geology 204 as a Science B GUR course |
Robert Thorndike moved to approve
offering Geology 204 as a Science B GUR course, seconded by Brian Burton,
and passed by the members.
The GER Committee approved this on April 10th and requested that
the matter be expedited so that the course could be offered for GUR credit
next year. The intention is to teach this in tandem next year with English
238, though each of Geology 204 and English 238 is approved as a stand-alone
GUR course. There was substantial departmental and CASC enthusiasm for the
novel experiment of tandem teaching these courses. |
4/15/03 |
'Advanced Media Literacy'-Title Change |
A motion
was made by Shelby Sheppard, seconded by Brian Burton, and passed by the members, to approve the change in title of
�Advanced Media Literacy� to �Media Literacy�, since the first title
implied that there was a preceding or introductory level class. Perry had
already obtained the required signature from the Associate Dean of Arts and
Sciences. |
4/1/03 |
Policy on Use of Honor Cords at Western Commencement |
Tjalling
Ypma proposed the following motion,
seconded by Shelby Sheppard and unanimously passed by the members: �Only cords issued by Western Washington University (Magna Cum Laude,
Cum Laude, and WWU Honors program) may be worn at Western�s commencement
ceremonies.� v
Chair
Downing led the discussion with members on the subject of �cord� policy
at Western�s graduation ceremonies because constituents have brought the
concern to ACC about the proliferation of different and varying kinds of
cords worn at graduation. As it
stands, the university allows cords for students graduating Magna Cum Laude,
Cum Laude, and in the Honors program. v
In
earlier discussions members who were surveyed noted that several additional
organizations were encouraging students to wear their cords.
Members recommended that Western allow graduates to wear only those
cords provided by Western. Graduates
are earning degrees from Western Washington University, and these cords
acknowledge that. v
ACC
commissioners expressed concern that the proliferation of cords from
different organizations, some of whom might begin to solicit Western
students to join their organizations, and even request a type of
acknowledgement in the ceremony�s printed program might have a cheapening
effect on the meaning of wearing cords. At the same time members acknowledged that at some future
date the ACC may wish to broaden the policy.
v
According
to the Associated Students Vice President for Academic Affairs, who
solicited some student opinion on the subject, a slight majority of Western
students are supportive of a strict cord policy in light of the importance
and formality of the commencement exercise. |
4/1/03 |
General Studies Major Committee |
The Executive Committee moved and seconded the following charge to the Ad Hoc Committee on the General Studies Major, which was passed by the members. �CHARGE TO THE AD
HOC COMMITTEE ON THE GENERAL STUDIES MAJOR The Committee shall consist of five
members: The Director of Academic Advising, one student to be chosen by the
ASB, and three faculty to be chosen by the ACC. The Committee's task shall
be to review the current General Studies Major and to identify its strengths
and weaknesses. The committee shall make recommendations on strengthening
the major should that appear to be appropriate, keeping in mind the
importance of preserving its role as an alternative for students who have
found it difficult to complete a departmental major late in their
undergraduate careers. The
Committee shall select its own Chair.� Advice for the
committee (not an exhaustive list): �
Determine why it is important to have this
major. What factors led to its
creation? �
Collect data on the profiles of current
General Studies majors. Interview at least some of these students and
inquire as to the reason for their choice to become GS majors. �
Consider whether the General Studies Major
should be housed in a single college. �
Examine similar majors at other schools,
such as UW and WSU, as well as student designed majors at WWU. �
Consider requiring students to declare a
GS major in a timely fashion so that the major would not be simply a
collection of courses already taken, but would reflect a coherent design or
plan. �
Consider ways of making advisement a
larger part of the GS major than it is currently. �
Consider whether there should be a
standing committee of the ACC called "The General Studies Major
Committee" which would scrutinize and approve individual proposals. �
Decide whether all GSMs would be described
simply as General Studies Majors or whether they would be further described
by category (see WSU) or even by individual content. �
Consider requiring a capstone course or
paper for all GS majors (cf. the UW program) �
Consider finding ways of permitting GS
majors to enroll in courses that are ordinarily restricted to students in a
departmental major (otherwise the courses available to GS majors would
simply be left over courses in many cases, and this could easily interfere
with attempts to make the major more coherent).� |
4/1/03 |
Reading of Minutes |
A motion
was brought by the ACC Executive Committee, which the members passed
unanimously (text follows): �The ACC will henceforth abandon the practice of subjecting minutes of committees reporting to it to both a 1st and a 2nd reading. If questions or concerns arise regarding the minutes as a whole or on particular actions recorded in those minutes, approval of the whole or part will be delayed until those questions or concerns are satisfactorily resolved.� |
2/18/03 |
Extension Courses |
A motion
was brought by the ACC Executive Committee, which the members passed
unanimously (text follows): |
2/18/03 |
All courses subject to ACC review | MOTION: No credit-bearing courses may be offered by Western Washington University without being reviewed and approved by the Academic Coordinating Commission. Credit-bearing courses that do not undergo review in a collegiate curricular committee or committee that reports to the ACC must be approved directly by the ACC. | Jan 21, 2002 |